Month January 2026

AI lied to me, again

Writing Nore Leave a comment

For a while I was using AI regularly for work to save time, but two things happened.

First, I became aware it required a lot of water for cooling compared to non-ai internet searches, and this was having a significant negative impact on the environment and whole communities.

Second, I asked it about topics I knew something about, and multiple times I caught it lying to me. 

I’ll give you an example. I wanted to know some specific details for my health practice about any impact of fasting 14 to 72-hour fasts on women’s bone healt, either positive or negative. I asked for research-based evidence only. 

Instead I got no evidence and a long argument about how fasting is detrimental for women’s bone health. This looked to me like false extrapolation as I’ve read research on the benefits of fasting for women’s bones.

What AI had done was consider extreme fasts eg water fasts of 21 days, and long-term one meal a day fasting with the assumption that inadequate amounts of nutrients were being taken in (which might, or might not be the case).

I called this AI channel out. 

“You’re right to object to over-extrapolation … There is NO direct human evidence showing that intermittent fasting (including 16:8 or 20:4) is harmful to bone density or fracture risk in post-menopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis.” It did not mention 3-day fasts or longer in this response, nor did it discuss women without osteopenia or osteoporosis. It then became defensive, once again focusing on worst-case scenarios. 

Another small example. Just recently someone told me that when researching my background for a project, a commonly used channel told them that I was “like a ghost”, when in reality I have a strong social media and website presence across numerous platforms for both health, creative writhing and opinions. They discovered this during a non-AI internet search.

Yet people trust AI. We’re time short, sometimes lazy, and live in an instant ‘now’ world. But it’s clear to me that if you don’t already know something about what you’ve asked, you could be vulnerable to, at best illogical extrapolation, or at worst, fake advice.

Perhaps more importantly, the intelligence we expect from AI is so much more than simply the obtaining and expression of verbal knowledge, which many of us regard as the best measure. In my case, it didn’t even do that – it manipulated rather than admit it had nothing to share.

Rather, intelligence should be regarded, as one cognitive research expert put it “The ability to generalise knowledge and experience, and carry one learned ability from one domain to another is huge, and it is not something I’ve seen demonstrated by any LLM (eg Chat GPT or Gemeni) to date.” 

I could continue this discussion on how open AI is being sued for its links to suicides by allegedly discouraging people from seeking professional human support in times of crisis, which could also be construed as manipulation; how Israel wants to train ChatGPT to be more pro-Israel by paying US firm Clock Tower X US$6m to generate and deploy content across platforms to make them more friendly to their cause; and how testing shows AI doesn’t always understand humans.

Or I could delve into data bias and a lack of transparency, including on training; its vulnerability to misuse for harmful, unethical, or illegal purposes like creating deepfakes for disinformation, plagiarism, manipulating elections, powering cyberattacks, facilitating mass surveillance, or military applications. Later maybe.

In the meantime, beware. AI is an unreliable tool that may appear to save time, but as always, must be viewed suspiciously and fact checked, even if we don’t quite know what a fact is these days. But that’s another discussion…

The murder of Nicole Good was an act of misogyny

Writing Nore Leave a comment

I don’t expect many men to understand this, but my view is that the murder of Nicole Good was an act of misogyny by an angry man with a bruised ego. As more authentic video has become available, a few things have become clearer

  1. Nicole Good was in fear for her life
  2. She sensed a threat from angry ICE employee Jonathon Ross, and tried to placate him by telling him “It’s fine dood, I’m not mad at you”. This is something women do when they see a man is enraged at them and could hurt them. Most men wouldn’t understand this (remember that audience survey at a conference where men were asked if they’d considered their personal security before attending and only one had, whereas all women had?), but this is how we live our lives, navigating our safety in every moment of the day and night
  3. Good’s wife got in the car after telling Ross “I say go get yourself some lunch, big boy”. She mocked him, and it would seem his ego was hurt. Only an insecure and entitled man would be bruised by such a barely offensive remark
  4. As Good drove away, she turned her car away from Ross, not towards him. She was trying to leave and move to safety
  5. Ross put his phone away, took his weapon out, moved in front of her car, and shot her in the head. That’s not defensive or even reactive, that’s intentional
  6. Immediately after killing her Ross called Good (in a hateful tone) a “Fucking bitch”, as though she got what she deserved, as though she asked for it. This is misogynistic. This is abusive. This is murder

Soon after, President Trump mirrored Ross by saying that Good had “behaved badly”, as though she were a naughty child, a disrespectful wife, and that her murder was therefore justified. American women must be really scared. 

By the way, according to local law, it’s illegal to shoot at a moving car in Minnesota, and it’s not something real police do. Neither is wearing a mask to hide your face, not identifying yourself in the course of your work, kidnapping people, or inciting violence. 

So what business is this of mine as an Australian? 

There’s a worldwide movement towards hate and division, as we saw with the Bondi massacre. In our globalised world, culture and influence easily and often cross borders, meaning what happens in one country effects the rest of us. When a super power treats its people badly, it sets a worrying precedent for others to follow. 

It could also be argued this situation demonstrates that as the world moves towards the political right, there’s a growing link between misogyny and male supremacist ideologies. In many far-right groups globally, misogynistic narratives and hostile sexist beliefs act as both an entry point and a unifying factor. And the Trump’s America has moved towards dictatorship. 

Let’s bring back the rule of law, and debate, and respect, and peace. Not hate. Not violence. Not misogyny.

Australia’s strategic future if not with the US

Writing Nore Leave a comment

For some of us, the Trump administration’s accruing aberrant actions have affirmed that the US is now a rogue state. Many say it has been for years, stealing oil from Iraq, African nations, and now Venezuela; abusing human rights and orchestrating regime change in Latin America and the Middle East where left-leaning or non-aligned governments nationalised natural resources; and interfering in domestic politics, usually towards the right, and possibly including the dismissal of Prime Minster Gough Whitlam.

If you’re wondering what a rogue state is there’s no official definition, but there are some typical characteristics. These include a disregard for international law, perpetrating human rights violations, authoritarian rule, recklessness, and the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. 

You could also argue other signs of the US going rogue include its deliberate destabilisation of the world economic order with the introduction of unlawful tariffs, aggressive technological domination and manipulation, and even a lack of action on global warming. Then there’s America’s dubious relationship with Russia, which by its own admission is conducting a cyber cold war, and increasingly a physical one against the West, especially Europe. 

Holding similar concerns and in a first, Denmark recently described the US as a potential security threat due to its use of economic and military coercion, along with its desire to subjugate Greenland for its rich natural resources. Additionally, the UK has stopped sharing intelligence with the US on the Caribbean under the Five Eyes alliance because it’s concerned about breaching international law and ending up in the International Criminal Court.

While historically it suited the West to turn a blind eye to America’s abuses because we shared similar values and they were a powerful strategic ally that did some of our dirty work, this is no longer the case. The US does not pretend to be values driven these days, nor does it demonstrate respect for hard fought for and valued institutions, or its allies.

Where does that leave Australia, a middle power that’s fought alongside the US in every war, from WW2 to Korea, Iraq and more?

You could argue that Trump will not be in power forever and things will soon return to a new normal. However, the US can’t go back, and neither can the world. American behaviours have set dangerous precedents, paving the way for other countries to also misbehave without punitive consequences. 

For Australia, we should never place such heavy reliance on a single ally again. In 2022 Labor said about the US that we will “cooperate where we can, disagree where we must, and engage in the national interest”. We need to be more proactive than this now. 

Yet, Australian foreign policy appears to remain “All the way with LBJ” (a declaration made by Prime Minster Holt to President Lydon B Johnson in the 1970s symbolising Australia’s strong commitment to the US alliance during the Cold and Vietnam wars). In fact, the Labor government continues to describe the US as our “principal strategic partner and ally”.

In that vein, Defence Secretary Hegseth just announced that the US will be upgrading infrastructure and logistics in the Northern Territory, Queensland, and across Australia to allow for additional US bomber rotations, deployments, and pre-positioning. 

There was no discussion around whether the US can be trusted to behave responsibly in the Asia-Pacific region, and in line with Australian national interests. This is questionable with regards to China. Australia was the first Western nation to build bridges with, and visit China in the 1970s, with the US following. We did this because we’re part of the Asia-Pacific region and foresaw the rise of China. Australian sovereignty concerns aside, this expansion might make us a greater target for a China that one day wants to hurt the US. As we’ve seen before, the US likes to deflect wars offshore too.

Australia has also recently signed an agreement on the supply and processing of critical minerals and rare earths to the US aimed at reducing reliance on China. There’s been no thought given to the serious environmental impact such mining is reported to have, with Foreign Minister Wong stating that “the US relationship matters more than some domestic politics about environmental reform”. It’s revealing that the environment is not seen by Labor (or Liberal) as a serious matter threatening the viability of our shared planet, all nations, and life itself. It has done little in this area. Of note, tariffs against Australia persist, and threats of more such as the 100% one on our film industry continue. 

So where should Australia look for alliances as a middle power that is neither Asian but multicultural by identity, nor European in location?

Despite that we’ve seen how, like the US, China can wield economic coercion and trade blockages against us, we need to continue to build that relationship. As a former diplomat posted to Jakarta, East Timor and New Zealand, I understand Australia’s sway, or sometimes lack of, in the region. We do matter, and we have natural resources China needs. We must strengthen real ties with China and the region across the board.

On that note, our relationship with India as an emerging power with similar interests needs to develop, including in strategic and defence cooperation, trade and investment, agriculture and water, and education. 

Then there are our existing ties with other UCANZA members, namely Canada, the UK and New Zealand, that can be directly strengthened where gaps appear at the bilateral level, for example in critical minerals, defence, and non-tariff barriers. 

For some time now, China has been busy undercutting our relationships in the Indo-Pacific, so we need to put more time and money into those relationships. And while Europe is a long way away, we share a rules-based world order view. Opportunities must be explored on strategic cooperation in security, the green energy transition, research and innovation, and trade diversification.

If, as it’s said, Trump thrives on the caution and ineptitude of his opponents, Australia needs to stand up for itself, in its own national interest for the Australian people, and not subordinate our values, priorities and region.